Sunday, August 4, 2013

The Shining analysis - part 5: Dick Hallorann; more Jungian psychology



In Susan's dream, while Dick Hallorann is driving to Durkin's Garage, where he is to pick up a snowcat so that he can get to the Overlook hotel and check on things, he sees a red VW bug partially crushed under a truck. This is a representation of reality in that the VW in which the family Susan partially based the Torrances on, crashed with, and was partially crushed under, a truck while the family was traveling to the Overlook (with Susan in the car) so that they could begin their task as winter caretakers for the hotel. Recall that the real-life crash resulted from the father, who was driving, losing coordination due to being poisoned with mercury by his wife. Hallorann is, in part, the mediator between Susan Robertson's unconscious and her conscious mind (as discussed below); he is her internal psychological 'link' between her dream and reality. (This is not to say that only those parts of the dream in which we see Hallorann, are based on reality).


Since the family assigned to look over the hotel crashed on the way there and never made it, then the reality is, there's no one in the hotel after the real hotel manager (represented by Stuart Ullman in the dream) and the rest of the staff have left there for the winter. Susan's knowledge of this fact is represented in her dream by the sequence of events in which the ranger station radios the hotel to check on things, and no one answers the radio, after Hallorann tries unsuccessfully to call the hotel, and then calls the station. The real manager of the hotel would, of course, have known that no one showed up on closing day. He simply left the hotel at the end of the season with no one there, since he knew there wasn't enough time to get someone else to look over it before snowy weather set in.




Dick Hallorann (above left) phones the ranger station (above right), and expresses concern that no one answered when he called the Overlook.


Later in Susan's dream, after Hallorann arrives in Denver from Florida, he calls Durkin's garage from the Denver airport, and tells Durkin that the people hired to take care of the Overlook turned out to be incompetent. In terms of reality, 'Hallorann' doesn't realize that the reason no one answered the phone when he called the hotel from Florida, is because no one is in the hotel. When Hallorann goes to the hotel and is confronted and killed by Jack Torrance, this is only a manifestation of the fantasy aspect of 'dream-logic', since it cannot, of course, be the case that no one is in the hotel, while at the same time, Jack (and his family) are there.




Hallorann (above left) calls Larry Durkin (above right) from the airport in Denver.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Depiction of an 'evil Trinity' in the movie
In the dream being depicted in The Shining, there is an 'evil Trinity' whereby Jack represents the Father; Danny represents the Son; and Dick Hallorann represents Holy Spirit. The fact that Hallorann is black symbolizes that he represents a corrupted Holy Spirit. To see how it is that there can be an evil Trinity (more properly, an evil triad) corresponding to the Holy Trinity, we turn to Jung's "The Phenomenology of the Spirit in Fairytales": "Among the alchemists we can see clearly how the divine Trinity has its counterpart in a lower, chthonic triad (similar to Dante's three-headed devil). This represents a principle which, by reason of its symbolism, betrays affinities with evil, though it is by no means certain that it expresses nothing but evil. Everything points rather to the fact that evil, or its familiar symbolism, belongs to the family of figures which describe the dark, nocturnal, lower, chthonic element. In this symbolism the lower stands to the higher as a correspondence in reverse; that is to say it is conceived, like the upper, as a triad."[a]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dick Hallorann (above left) and Jack Torrance (above right) each represent different aspects of Susan Robertson's animus.


Susan Robertson's split animus
Back in part 2 of the analysis, we observed that in Jungian psychology, the animus is the unconscious masculine component in women; also recall that we have commented on the psychological duality within Susan Robertson, as represented in her dream by, for example, the prominence of mirrors and of 'doubles' (the twins, the two boilers, etc.). One manifestation of Susan's duality is that she has a kind of 'split' animus - her animus is broken up into two 'parts' or aspects, represented by Dick Hallorann and Jack Torrance, respectively. Hallorann represents that part of Susan's animus that is the mediator between her unconscious and her conscious mind, and the fact that he is black indicates that he also represents that part of Susan's animus that has been cross-contaminated with contents from her shadow (i.e., her dark side). Since Hallorann represents the Holy Spirit, his 'contamination' suggests the idea of 'corruption' of the Christian Holy Spirit (as mentioned above, his being black itself suggests this), and the fact that Jack kills him represents the death of the Holy Spirit, a topic which will be discussed later in the analysis.

Since Hallorann's first name is Dick, signifying the male sex organ, he represents the overtly masculine component of Susan's animus. Jack, on the other hand, since he is a writer, represents that part of Susan's animus that is intellectual.


a. Jung, C.G. "The Phenomenology of the Spirit in Fairytales" in The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 9, part 1. Princeton University Press, 1969. para. 425.


   






Disclaimers
1) In certain instances it has been determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society in their productions. These statements should be taken as expressing the opinions of no one other than the creators.

2) This blog is not associated with Stanley Kubrick or the Kubrick estate, nor is it associated with any of the studios, authors, publishers, actors, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, other filmmakers, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the films or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced herein.

3) In keeping with the policies of the filmmakers, authors, studios, writers, and publishers, that have created the productions (and their source materials) that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog, any similarity of the characters in these films or source materials to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All images on this blog are used solely for non-commercial purposes of analysis, review, and critique.

All Wikipedia content on this blog, and any edits made to it, are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.